NOT KNOWN FACTUAL STATEMENTS ABOUT HOW CASES ARE HANDLED THAT ARE NOT MENTIONED IN LAW

Not known Factual Statements About how cases are handled that are not mentioned in law

Not known Factual Statements About how cases are handled that are not mentioned in law

Blog Article

Courts prioritize fairness and copyright fundamental rights although respecting the autonomy of educational institutions. Around the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided by the decision in the Supreme Court in the case of Khyber Medical University and others v. Aimal Khan and others, PLD 2022 Supreme Court 92. nine. The aforesaid exceptions are lacking from the present case. In such circumstances, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and is dismissed accordingly with pending application (s). Read more

refers to law that comes from decisions made by judges in previous cases. Case regulation, also known as “common legislation,” and “case precedent,” delivers a common contextual background for certain legal concepts, And just how They're applied in certain types of case.

When the state court hearing the case reviews the regulation, he finds that, while it mentions large multi-tenant properties in some context, it truly is actually quite obscure about whether the ninety-day provision relates to all landlords. The judge, based to the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held for the 90-working day notice necessity, and rules in Stacy’s favor.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Specified the legal analysis on the topic issue, we're from the view that the claim on the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is just not legally sound, besides promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, These are matter to rules and regulations In the event the recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case of the petitioners for promotion can be regarded, however, we are clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion as the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum fitness, subject to availability of vacancy subject towards the approval from the competent authority.

lengthy period petitioner wasn't deemed for promotion, meeting in the departmental promotion committee and evaluate the petitioner (Promotion)

In this site post, we will delve into the details of Section 302 PPC, Discovering its provisions along with the gravity of its punishment.

73 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Pertaining to the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 get more info of the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice isn't served, the grievance petition could be dismissed. This is because service on the grievance notice is often a mandatory need and a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law requires that a grievance notice be served on the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In case the employer fails to respond or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) Should the organization is transprovincial.

The Court regarded as the case to generally be maintainable under Article 184 (three) Because the danger and encroachment alleged were for example to violate the constitutional right to life when interpreted expansively.

This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based to the Niazi case analogy. 9. In view of the above facts and circumstances in the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 with the Constitution. Read more

In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution is usually justified when the basic norm underlying a Constitution disappears and also a new system is set in its place.

The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is definitely the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It involves the execution in the convicted person for a consequence of their crime.

Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury to a person, by performing an act which inside the ordinary course of nature is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently hazardous that it must in all probability cause death, causes the death in the such person, is alleged to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”

If the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only performed Should the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and also the petitioner company responded to the allegations therefore they were nicely aware of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use being seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case law previously rendered on similar cases.

Report this page